Ceisteanna—Questions . Oral Answers . - House Purchase Grants .
- First-time house purchase grant 22 speeches
The Minister reported 12,696 applications, 8,161 approvals and 2,641 grants paid. Deputies pressed for an increase as house prices rose, but he gave no review date and said the grant remained under review; he also clarified the figures after a dispute over their meaning.
John F. O'Connell, Sylvester Barrett, Michael Begley, Thomas J. Fitzpatrick, Brendan Corish
- Grant inspection delays and staffing 8 speeches
O’Toole said inspection delays were causing problems and asked whether staffing would increase. The Minister said extra staff had been recruited and more were being recruited, but declined to provide numbers without a written question.
Patrick O'Toole, Sylvester Barrett, Jim Mitchell
- Meaning and timing of grant review 4 speeches
Quinn sought a clearer timeframe for the Minister’s promised review. Barrett said he knew what he meant and intended to follow through, but again gave no date.
Ruairí Quinn, Joseph Brennan, Thomas J. Fitzpatrick, Sylvester Barrett
asked the Minister for the Environment the number of people who have availed of the £1,000 grant for first-time purchasers of houses.
Comment on this
: A total of 12,696 applications for the £1,000 grant have been received in the Department up to 31 May 1978 and of these, 8,161 have been approved. 2,641 grants have been paid in the same period.
Comment on this
: Has the Minister any intention of increasing the grant in view of the escalation in the price of houses?
Comment on this
: At the time the £1,000 grant was made available it was said it would be reviewed from time to time.
Comment on this
: How soon will this review take place in view of the rapid increase in the price of houses?
Comment on this
: That I am not prepared to say, considering the first review took place the day after I became Minister. We are not given to long delays.
Comment on this
(Cavan-Monaghan): Since the date of the introduction of this grant does the Minister appreciate the cost of building houses has gone up by at least £2,500, and probably much more, and that the grant has been completely eroded, and will the Minister review it now having regard to the realities of the costs?
Comment on this
: The grant is still popular and I would like to point out that 12,696 applications were received in nine months and the total number of grants in the first six months of 1977 was 2,040.
Comment on this
(Cavan-Monaghan): Would the Minister agree it is popular in the sense that anything is better than nothing? What does he mean by reviewing it and when does he propose to review it?
Comment on this
: I mean exactly what I said. It will be kept under review. I am not prepared to say when. Remember, there was no change in the grant for four years prior to my becoming Minister.
Comment on this
: But the price of a house did not go up by £4,000 as it has done in the last four months.
Comment on this
: The Minister says he will keep it under review. He could do that for the next seven years.
Comment on this
: Is it not misleading for the Minister to say, as he did in his reply, that the number of grants paid out were 12,000 while the figures he gave earlier were 2,600? He compared the figures for the previous Administration in the previous year with those of the current year and the implication was he gave out 12,000 grants.
Comment on this
: I did not give that impression. The number of applications was 12,696. I gave the separate totals. I gave three figures—applications, approvals and grants.
Comment on this
: The Minister is making capital out of the fact that the scheme is so popular there were 12,000 odd applications.
Comment on this
: The fact is that the delay in having inspections carried out is causing havoc and has the Minister any intention of increasing the inspection staff commensurate with the so-called increase in applications?
Comment on this
: I have already done so and the Deputy exaggerates when he says delay is causing havoc. The delay is quite short. Admittedly there were delays initially because of the big number of applications.
Comment on this
: More staff had to be recruited and at the moment more inspectors are being recruited. The existing staff are working overtime.
Comment on this
: A great number of our queries would not arise if the Minister would give some indication of what exactly he means by "review". Does he mean three months? If he will clarify what he means we will ask questions that make some sense. Review does not mean something specific.
Comment on this
(Cavan-Monaghan): Would the Minister agree that what his colleagues, the Minister for Finance and the Minister for Economic Planning and Development, mean by review would be much more important than what the Minister means?