B & I-Sealink arrangements
Cullen sought clarity on the Minister’s responsibility for B & I’s arrangements with privately owned Sealink. The Minister said he could not speak for Sealink, but described the profit- and revenue-sharing arrangements and invited a specific question.
I am somewhat confused here. I asked a similar question with regard to B & I and Sealink and the cartel arrangement between them, and the Minister said he had not any responsibility in that matter, that it was a matter for the companies themselves. I cannot reconcile that comment with some of those he has just made. Could we establish exactly what are his responsibilities in relation to the B & I?
Comment on this
My responsibilities are simple; it is a State-owned company. The Deputy will realise that Sealink is a privately-owned company and, consequently, one in which I have no say with regard to whatever arrangements they may make, even those with a company wholly-owned by the State. I cannot talk about Sealink. It is a private company that takes its own business decisions and makes it own arrangements.
Comment on this
I accept the Minister's comments in regard to Sealink but not in regard to the B & I, a major partner in this deal. Surely the Minister can comment on the B & I end of this cartel agreement in regard to capacity sharing and price fixing?