We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna-Questions. Oral Answers. - B & I Losses.

B & I-Sealink arrangements

Summary

Cullen sought clarity on the Minister’s responsibility for B & I’s arrangements with privately owned Sealink. The Minister said he could not speak for Sealink, but described the profit- and revenue-sharing arrangements and invited a specific question.

I am somewhat confused here. I asked a similar question with regard to B & I and Sealink and the cartel arrangement between them, and the Minister said he had not any responsibility in that matter, that it was a matter for the companies themselves. I cannot reconcile that comment with some of those he has just made. Could we establish exactly what are his responsibilities in relation to the B & I?

Comment on this

My responsibilities are simple; it is a State-owned company. The Deputy will realise that Sealink is a privately-owned company and, consequently, one in which I have no say with regard to whatever arrangements they may make, even those with a company wholly-owned by the State. I cannot talk about Sealink. It is a private company that takes its own business decisions and makes it own arrangements.

Comment on this

I accept the Minister's comments in regard to Sealink but not in regard to the B & I, a major partner in this deal. Surely the Minister can comment on the B & I end of this cartel agreement in regard to capacity sharing and price fixing?

Comment on this

If the Deputy puts down a question to that effect I will answer him fully. The arrangement at present is the sharing of the profits on the southern corridor and sharing of revenue on the Dún Laoghaire-Holyhead and Dublin-Liverpool routes.

Comment on this