It is proposed to take No. 3, Competition and Consumer Protection Bill 2014 - Second Stage (resumed); and No. 20, statements on the White Paper on Universal Health Insurance. It is proposed, notwithstanding anything in Standing Orders, that the following arrangements shall apply in relation to No. 20: the statements of the Minister or Minister of State and of the main spokespersons for Fianna Fáil, Sinn Féin and the Technical Group, who shall be called upon in that order, shall not exceed 30 minutes in each case and such Members may share their time, and the statements of each other Member called shall not exceed 30 minutes in each case and such Members may share their time; and a Minister or Minister of State shall be called upon to make a statement in reply which shall not exceed ten minutes. Private Members' business shall be No. 142, motion re the ambulance service (resumed), to conclude at 9 p.m. tonight if not previously concluded.

Tomorrow's business after Oral Questions shall be No. 3, Competition and Consumer Protection Bill 2014 - Second Stage (resumed); and No. 20, statements on the White Paper on Universal Health Insurance (resumed).

There is one proposal to be put to the House. Is the proposal for dealing with No. 20, statements on the White Paper on Universal Health Insurance, agreed?

It is not agreed. I want to oppose the Order of Business.

Certainly.

I am opposing it in light of what has transpired in the last 24 hours. The contents of an important memo have essentially been circulated to the media in precise detail. I note that the figure of €537 million used by the Taoiseach is the exact figure cited in this morning's Irish Independent. Given that we are going into a week's recess tomorrow, I suggest that the Government should make time available today for a discussion on the contents of the memo in question. There is no doubt that its contents have been deliberately circulated to the media in precise detail. I know that Labour Party sources are on RTE right now describing the proposal with regard to the level of water charges as "half-baked".

We cannot have a long discussion on this.

We raised this in the Dáil yesterday. We have been raising it in the Dáil since last February.

The Deputy should speak to the Order of Business proposal.

We have spoken time and time again about the importance of clarity and transparency and the need for a debate on these issues. All along the way, the Taoiseach said that things would become clearer in a couple of weeks' time. He used the word "shortly" yesterday. He told us nothing about what was to take place at the Cabinet table this morning. He did not mention what the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government had in the locker and intended to reveal. I ask the Government to provide time for a debate today. If it is not prepared to publish the memo that has essentially been circulated, at least we should be furnished with a copy of it. Everybody in the media world seems to have a copy of it. If the Dáil is to have any relevance to topical issues that are of huge concern to the public, the Taoiseach should facilitate a genuine debate and provide for the circulation to the Members of this House, who are meant to represent the people, of the material that has been made available to the media.

I am less concerned with what others may have to say on this. I am anxious to know when the Government will circulate the full information. Will it facilitate statements on the issue of water charges in this House before the recess? Can that be accommodated tomorrow? Will the Taoiseach give a commitment to that effect?

The Deputy should confine his remarks to the Order of Business proposal.

If not, will he give a commitment to provide for such a debate at the earliest opportunity when the Dáil resumes following the Easter recess? There should be no further delay in relation to this matter being addressed in this House.

The Government will be quite happy to facilitate a debate when it has made its final decision on all of these matters.

I will be happy at that stage to point out the differences between the Government's approach, which brings about an average metered charge, on the basis of figures supplied by the CSO and so on, of €240 per annum, as against Fianna Fáil's position that it will be €400 and that the charge should be introduced without any reference to fairness, equity or affordability.

Is the proposal agreed to?

The programme for Government contains a commitment to legislate on the issue of Cabinet confidentiality. Will the Taoiseach indicate when that legislation will be brought forward? Given the selective and random manner in which the Government decides that it wants to breach Cabinet confidentiality, in its efforts to manage and control news and engage in spin, will the Taoiseach indicate whether he is proposing a more liberal regime in this regard? This is a very relevant question in view of all the memos that are being circulated at random by Ministers.

The programme for Government gives an undertaking that during this Government's term, GP training places will be increased, GPs will be encouraged to defer retirement, doctors will be recruited from abroad and the number of practice nurses will be increased. Does the Taoiseach accept that the opposite is happening, with young GPs emigrating in alarming numbers, incomes dropping dramatically and GP morale at an all-time low? The legislation the Government promised in the programme for Government to deal with all aspects of primary care provision has not yet been delivered and many promises have been broken in this regard. When can we expect the universal primary care Bill and when will we see additional GPs, as promised in the programme for Government? Can we take it that the commitment to provide free GP care for those with long-term illnesses will not be met? Is there any prospect of discretionary medical cards being restored to the most ill and most vulnerable, including children with multiple disabilities, when the proposals for free GP care for children aged under six are introduced?

I am not proposing a more liberal regime in respect of Cabinet confidentiality.

You are certainly practising it.

I expect every member of the Cabinet to live up to his or her constitutional responsibilities in so far as confidentiality is concerned, and I am satisfied they all do so.

Regarding GP training places, young GPs emigrating, difficulties being encountered by the medical profession and so on, these are all part of the discussions that are taking place between the Minister of State at the Department of Health, Deputy Alex White, and representatives of general practitioners in regard to the introduction of universal health insurance. I will have to get back to the Deputy on the exact position regarding the universal primary care Bill.

The Children First Bill 2014 was finally published on Monday. The guidelines were published as long ago as 1999 and it has taken until now for the legislation to present. It was the 2009 Ryan report which recommended the thrust of the proposals we now have. Considerable concern has been expressed by front-line providers in regard to the needs and care of children in so far as enforceability is concerned. When will the Children First Bill 2014 be brought before the House and is there a specific timeframe for its enactment?

The proposal for a health (general practitioner) medical service Bill to provide for a free GP service to children aged under six is one we supported on the basis that it would be rolled out universally within a very short timeframe. The concerns of GPs in regard to this legislation represent a considerable crisis. Members of all parties in the House attended an engagement with more than 400 GPs last Wednesday in Dublin to discuss the issue. Taking on board their concerns and the absence of negotiation with the IMO and other GP representative bodies, when will that Bill present before the House?

I am aware of the Deputy's interest in these matters. The situation in so far as negotiating rights are concerned is the subject of a court case to be determined and, as such, I cannot comment on it. The Minister of State, Deputy Alex White, is meeting and consulting with general practitioners throughout the country on the issue. The health (general practitioner medical service) Bill was approved at Cabinet this morning for publication, and the Minister will move on it now.

We have been waiting for the Children First Bill for more than 20 years. As the Deputy pointed out, the relevant report was published back in 1999. The Bill will be brought before the House just after Easter.

Tá ceisteanna agam faoi dhá phíosa reachtaíochta. Baineann an chéad cheist leis an leasú ar Acht na dTeangacha Oifigiúla atá le teacht. Cén uair a bhfoilseofar an Bille go hoifigiúil? Tá cúpla dréacht neamhoifigiúil feicthe agam go dtí seo.

There is a crisis in terms of the availability of housing in Dublin, particularly for those in receipt of rent supplement. In April 2012, the Government promised that a housing (miscellaneous provisions) Bill would be published shortly, before subsequently telling us it would be the end of 2012. We are still awaiting it. In the meantime, there is an absolute crisis in the provision of social housing in this city and elsewhere.

Maidir le hAcht na dTeangacha Oifigiúla, cuireadh na cinn don Bhille nua os comhair an Rialtais trí seachtaine ó shin agus foilseofar an Bille an seisiún seo.

Maidir leis an mBille eile, the housing (miscellaneous provisions) Bill is due to be debated in the House in May.

In view of the strong representations coming from all involved, would it be possible to bring the promised national paediatric hospital development board (amendment) Bill before the House earlier than anticipated? Will the Taoiseach indicate whether the heads of that Bill have been approved?

I am moved by the concerns expressed by the Leader of the Opposition wherein he expects to be able to have only half a power shower once every six months and to have to make tea without water, as well as a range of other restrictions.

Will the Deputy ask a question on legislation?

The environmental liability Bill, No. 49 on the list, will deal with all of this. Will the Taoiseach undertake to bring that Bill forward as quickly as possible to ensure no ill effects are suffered in any quarter, particularly in the area represented by the Leader of the Opposition?

I do not have a date for the second Bill to which the Deputy referred.

The heads of the national paediatric hospital development board (amendment) Bill have not yet been cleared by Government. A great deal of work is ongoing in that regard and I will ask the Minister for Health, Deputy James Reilly, to update Deputy Durkan on the current position.

The Government has undertaken to initiate a reform programme or agenda in respect of the National Library of Ireland, the National Museum of Ireland and the National Archives of Ireland. When can we expect the two national cultural institutions Bills that are outstanding to be published?

The heads of both Bills have been cleared by Government. The Bills are due for publication later this year, probably after the summer recess.

Some weeks ago, an undemocratic and farcical decision was taken by a group of Fingal councillors, a number of whom will either not stand again or will be defeated in the forthcoming elections, in regard to the Dublin mayoralty. The overwhelming majority of the 127 Dublin councillors, from the Ceann Comhairle's area in Dún Laoghaire, from south Dublin, Dublin city and Fingal, voted that people at least be allowed to make a decision on whether or not Dublin should, in common with all other great cities, have a directly elected mayor.

In view of what happened in Fingal and in light of the fact that many people believe that the legislation brought forward by the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government, Deputy Hogan, was deliberately designed to end in failure, will the Taoiseach give all Dubs a chance to make a decision as to whether they want a directly-elected mayor? In a few days' time, people all over the city, from the Ceann Comhairle's constituency to my own, will be supporting the great Dublin football team in the national league final. There is a need for a democratic decision in respect of this matter. We should have a directly-elected mayor with strong powers and considerable autonomy because that is how it works in most great capital cities. Will the Taoiseach give the Dubs a chance to vote on having a directly-elected mayor by introducing new legislation the week after next?

The Dubs were certainly in devastating form during the second half of last Sunday's game. Councillors in Fingal were democratically elected to represent the people who live there. Proceeding with the proposition that was put forward in respect of a directly-elected mayor was contingent on all the councils supporting it.

We are talking here about a tiny minority. There was only one blue shirt involved.

Fingal County Council is a democratically elected authority and those who were elected as members of it represent all of the people. The members of the council made a democratic decision.

They did not make such a decision.

Sorry about that, Deputy Broughan.

What happened was ridiculous.

When will the Bill amending the Health Act 2007, the purpose of which will be to extend HIQA's remit to include functions with regard to medical ionising radiation protection and the setting and monitoring of standards for private or independent health care providers, be published?

The heads of that Bill have not yet been presented to Cabinet. However, they are expected to be forthcoming later this year.

This Easter weekend a Garda operation aimed at detecting traffic violations will be carried out countrywide. The number of gardaí on traffic duty has been reduced from 1,200 to 800. Last year and to date this year the number of deaths on our roads has increased and speeding has been identified as one of the main reasons for this. Will the Taoiseach indicate when the road traffic Bill will be introduced and whether the reduction in the number of gardaí on traffic duty could have had an impact in the context of the number of deaths on our roads?

That Bill is due next year.

Is the Taoiseach at all embarrassed with regard to the suggested average water charge of €240 that is going to be imposed on people?

We do not deal with embarrassment on the Order of Business.

The Labour Party promised to save Fine Gael €238, an almost identical amount-----

It was €400.

The Deputy knows as well as I that he is out of order.

-----in its infamous Tesco advertisements during the most recent general election campaign.

To what legislation is the Deputy referring?

I wish to refer to the debate which the Taoiseach promised this morning. As he quaintly - some would say crudely - stated during the election campaign, "Paddy likes to know what the story is". However, he is keeping ordinary people in the dark.

We have dealt with that issue.

I want the Taoiseach to be very precise in terms of indicating when the Government proposes to return to the Dáil with details relating to the charging regime that will apply in the context of this new bondholder water tax. If we do not receive the relevant information prior to the Easter recess, will it be made available in the first week following the recess? Will ordinary people have full knowledge of what will be involved prior to their voting in the European and local elections.

Yes, they will have full knowledge.

On what date will matters be made clear?

I am not going to provide a precise date but the people will have full knowledge.

At a joint policing committee meeting on Monday last, the Garda outlined that there has been a 20% increase in crime levels in rural areas of Galway. Some ten Garda stations have been closed and 27 Garda vehicles have been taken out of commission in the areas to which I refer.

The Deputy might be better served by tabling a Topical Issue on the matter.

In the context of the criminal justice (miscellaneous provisions) Bill, will the Taoiseach give a commitment to the effect that he will consider this issue and see to it that additional vehicles are provided to the Galway division of An Garda Síochána.

When is the Bill due?

I am not in a position to indicate when it will be introduced but the statistics for crime show a drop across all categories throughout most areas of provincial Ireland.

There has been a 20% increase in Galway.

I do not have the figures for Galway to hand.

Perhaps the Deputy might table a parliamentary question on the matter.

Some 27 Garda cars have been taken out of commission in the area.

In the neighbouring country, there was a drop of 6% in the crime rate despite the fact that ten stations were closed. We will examine the matter for the Deputy.

I thank the Taoiseach.

In the context of the proposed maritime area and foreshore (amendment) Bill, a review of the licensing of seaweed harvesting is currently under way. This a very contentious issue, particularly in coastal areas. When is progress expected to be made in the context of the proposed Bill?

The maritime area and foreshore (amendment) Bill is due for publication this session.

In the context of the delivery of medical and nursing services and the pending legislation on universal health insurance, it is alarming that young GPs and trainee nurses are under such pressure at present.

To what Bill is the Deputy referring?

This morning the case of a trainee nurse who worked ten weeks without a day off was referred to on radio.

That matter is not relevant to the Order of Business.

It is relevant to the health and well-being of people in this country.

The Deputy should either table a parliamentary question in respect of this matter or raise it as a Topical Issue.

Crisis point has been reached in respect of the pay of and hours worked by young trainee nurses.

We cannot discuss this matter on the Order of Business. Is there a Bill in respect of this matter?

No. The case to which the Deputy refers is one for the management in the relevant hospital to deal with. The approvals relating to re-rostering under the Haddington Road agreement should apply.

What was described on radio earlier is prevalent throughout the system. These people are double-jobbing and, as a result of tiredness, they are sometimes not in a position to notice if patients' health is deteriorating.

The Deputy received a reply. He should please resume his seat.