Budget poverty proofing
Róisín Shortall asked whether Budget 2020 had been poverty-proofed and when the overdue anti-poverty strategy would appear. The Minister said official analysis did not show a regressive effect for most people, noted the ESRI had not counted service improvements, and later said the information would be made available.
According to the ESRI's analysis of last week's budget, it was regressive and will have the greatest impact on those people who are on the lowest incomes. I have two questions. Was the budget poverty-proofed? When are we likely to see the new national anti-poverty strategy, which is now two years overdue?
Comment on this
I can deal with the poverty-proofing of the budget. The Department of Public Expenditure and Reform looked at the impact of the budget on different income groups. Our analysis was that the budget would not have a regressive impact on the vast majority of people. The ESRI's analysis, to which the Deputy referred, did not take account of service improvements.
Comment on this
On which page of the Budget Statement is that outlined?
Comment on this
For example, it did not take account of the changes in the national childcare scheme. It focused on matters from a purely income distribution point of view. It did not look at any service improvements that the budget is looking to deliver.
Comment on this
Where is the Minister's analysis available?
Comment on this
The Deputy is entitled to ask one question on one matter. If she wishes to table a Topical Issue matter, we will consider it.
Comment on this
Perhaps the Minister will tell us where we can find the analysis about which he is speaking. We could not find it in his budget documentation.
Comment on this
I am happy to make that information available.